91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½

The 2025 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Annual Meeting will be held April 12–15 in Chicago, and the two scientists running the show are hard at work making sure the program is filled to the brim with exhilarating science and captivating speakers. 

The co-chairs — of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis — talked to 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today about the cutting-edge science they’re eager to showcase, how to make your annual meeting experience worthwhile and why they think it’s important for investigators and trainees alike to attend.

Their conversation has been edited for length, clarity and style.

Who should attend this meeting? 

Annual meeting co-chair Dave Pagliarini is a professor of cell biology and physiology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

Annual meeting co-chair Donita Brady is an associate professor of cancer biology, the assistant dean for inclusion, diversity and equity in research training and the vice chair for inclusion and equity of cancer biology at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.

Pagliarini: The 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting can be a profound learning experience for scientists at all career stages. I think this meeting should be attractive to trainees as well as investigators.

I believe that the breadth of this meeting is one of its strengths. It’s a great way to zoom out and experience the broad landscape of biomedical science. Attendees can get exposed to so many topics they would not see at more focused disciplinary meetings.

For me, the meeting always leads to new ideas and new directions. While running our laboratories, it’s easy to get stuck in our lanes. We all need to periodically switch gears and seek out new directions.

Brady: One of the special features of the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting for a trainee is the opportunity to be exposed to different areas of science — especially if you are starting to think about those next steps in your career. If a trainee is unsure about what they want to pursue postgraduate school — a postdoctoral fellowship or a position in academia or industry — they can start to explore that by being exposed to the breadth of science that will be presented at the 2025 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting.

One of the reasons we added some new themes, such as synthetic biology and chemical tools, is to give attendees the opportunity to apply these tools in their typical areas of research and start to think about them in a new way.

Tell me more about the themes you’ve selected for the symposia.

Pagliarini: First, we thought a lot about scientific areas related to our own interests and expertise. A couple of themes are very near and dear to my heart, such as metabolism and biosynthesis, interorganellar communication and molecular movement. I’m always interested in helping bring compelling new stories in my field to the forefront. 

We also thought about fields that are rapidly developing because we want these events to be helpful for attendees. We recognize that chemical tools and synthetic biology have broad and expanding utility in the biomedical sciences.

Of course, we also thought about foundational fields with a longstanding presence at the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting.

Brady: When thinking about how to incorporate epigenetic modifications to the genome this year, we decided to focus specifically on the context of cancer biology. We now really appreciate that epigenetic alterations are fundamental to the biology of tumors and avenues for therapeutic targeting.

How did you select the symposia organizers?

Brady: We tried to identify people who have been longstanding leaders in their fields and people who are at the forefront and making new, groundbreaking discoveries.

Pagliarini: We set our sights on theme leaders who are not only excellent scientists but also charismatic, energetic and broad-minded. Any one of these themes could be a multiday stand-alone meeting. There’s so much breadth and ground to cover. We encouraged the organizers to think broadly about how to sample across the full spectrum of their themes. 

Do you have any advice for poster presenters?

Pagliarini: It can be hard to know what to expect. You are in a sea of posters and may worry about how to stand out. Just realize that one or two substantive interactions at poster sessions are the big difference-makers. Focus less on trying to promulgate your work to many people and more on fostering a few in-depth conversations that may give you fresh eyes on your science.

What advice do you have for grad students and postdocs planning to attend?

Brady: For the first time, this year we’re going to have a daylong symposium for graduate students and postdocs on Saturday of the meeting. This event is being organized by our journals’ early-career reviewers and will highlight the research of our next generation of scientists, in particular those who will soon be on the job market. Graduate students and postdocs chosen based on their abstract submissions will present their research at the podium and will have the opportunity to receive feedback from peers. This event will also include a panel discussion covering career paths in academia and industry.

Many of us made our very first professional connections and built cohorts as a result of our participation at 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ annual meetings, and we want rising stars in the BMB field to make meaningful connections with fellow researchers that will endure for years to come.  So we encourage all graduate students and postdocs to start thinking about their abstract submissions as the annual meeting in Chicago provides more presentation opportunities than ever before. You’ll hear more about this event as well as the many other opportunities to meet and network with new and seasoned researchers at poster sessions, meetup events, interest groups sessions and workshops in the coming months.

Pagliarini: Trainees should never hesitate to approach speakers. I remember when I was a trainee, and even a new assistant professor, I’d go to meetings and see well-established speakers gathering together. At first, I felt somewhat excluded. But then I realized, after having a lab for a while, these are just people who are happy to see their colleagues. These meetings are a chance for them to reconnect. But, once you break in, they’re delighted to talk to you. They want to help and welcome you. Often, by taking that brave first step to introduce myself, I began to form connections.

When did you attend your first 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting, and what was that experience like?

Pagliarini: My first 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting was back in 2003. I was a graduate student in Jack Dixon's laboratory. Jack is a former president of the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½, and he was at the meeting to receive the William C. Rose Award. It was the first time I went to a big international meeting. It was inspiring to see my adviser winning an award, and it really reinforced the importance of the society and why Jack had been so passionate about it. It was why we had often published in 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ journals.

Brady: My first 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ meeting was in 2021 when I was invited to give a talk. I really loved the meeting because of the breadth of the science it featured and the way it connected to so many areas of research. That's what I loved and why I continue to come back.

It’s been almost eight years since the meeting was last held in Chicago. What should readers know about the location?

Pagliarini: It’s a beautiful, vibrant city. And it is home to many prominent institutions. I think Chicago is quite a gem of the Midwest. It definitely won’t disappoint.

Brady: I am really excited about it as a destination. It’s centrally located, so I hope it will be attractive for those in the Midwest, on the coasts and outside of the United States.

Chicago has a beautiful culture and museums as well as some of the world’s leading institutions. This location will provide an opportunity for the undergraduates in Chicago to attend their first meeting, catch the bug of what it means to be a scientific researcher as well as present their research on a world stage.

For the past couple of years, the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ has invited local students to the meeting for Community Day. Any thoughts on doing it in Chicago?

Brady: It’s our responsibility, as researchers and scientists, to provide that outreach to the public. Any meeting like this, no matter the location, can give back to the community. I think that connection to the area is something Dave and I would love to see as a part of the meeting. There’s an opportunity for us to make a difference in the Chicago community.