鈥業鈥檇 have to build the rails first鈥
The title of this essay series, “Derailed but Undeterred,” gave me a few problems at first when it came time to write. When I think about a derailed career, it suggests a carefully thought-out plan gone awry. The trouble is, when I think back to those first few years out of grad school, a carefully thought-out plan isn’t one of the things I remember!
I had accepted a postdoc at The Scripps Research Institute and moved from London to La Jolla but without any clear idea of where that would take me in the long term, and once I was there it started to become clear that an academic research job wasn’t that appealing.
Getting involved with Scripps’ postdoc association kindled an existing interest in science policy, but how was a postdoc from the U.K. supposed to make that leap in the U.S.? Perhaps, rather than being derailed, my career was more like a train sitting in a field: In order to get anywhere, I’d have to build the rails first.
For U.S. citizens, science policy fellowships sponsored by scientific societies such as the or the offered the clearest path from the lab to Washington, D.C. These weren’t really an option if, like me, you were a foreigner.
Armed with useful advice from people like Peter Fiske, who specializes in helping Ph.D.s realize their career options, I understood that over the next few years I needed to gain the same sort of experience on my own. Now at the University of Kentucky, I was fortunate to work for a supportive principal investigator. In the same way that other postdocs worked on independent research that would open the door to faculty appointments, I set about building the resume I’d need to open doors into policy.
Writing for the technology publication taught me how to write about science for different audiences. Teaching science policy at the on campus was invaluable for thinking about how to communicate science and science policy. Working with the , including a two-year stint on the board of directors, gave me actual policy experience and developed bureaucratic and organizational skills that I couldn’t get from the bench.
A little luck and a good professional network later, I found myself starting work in 2009 as a policy analyst at the National Human Genome Research Institute, one of the National Institutes of Health’s 27 institutes and centers and the organization behind the Human Genome Project. The past few years have involved working with some very smart and dedicated people in a very exciting area spanning the worlds of research and medicine. I may not have been able to predict this trajectory a decade ago, but it’s been a great journey.
Enjoy reading 91亚色传媒 Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from 91亚色传媒 Today
Enter your email address, and we鈥檒l send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Our top 10 articles of 2024
91亚色传媒 Today posted more than 400 original articles this year. The ones that were most read covered research, society news, policy, mental health, careers and more.
From curiosity to conversation: My first science café
鈥淲hy was I so nervous? I鈥檇 spoken in hundreds of seminars and classes, in front of large audiences.鈥 But this was the first time Ed Eisenstein was explaining his research 鈥渢o a crowd of nonscientists relaxing over food and drink at a local tavern.鈥
鈥極ne word or less鈥
For a long time, Howard Steinman thought this phrase was a joke: 鈥淟ess than one word is no words, and you can't answer a question without words.鈥
Can we make grad school more welcoming for all?
The students and faculty at most of the institutions training the next generation of STEM professionals do not reflect the country鈥檚 diversifying demographics, leaving a gap in experience and cultural understanding.
I am not a fake. I am authentically me
Camellia Moses Okpodu explains why she believes the term 鈥渋mposter syndrome鈥 is inaccurate and should be replaced.
Where do we search for the fundamental stuff of life?
Recent books by Thomas Cech and Sara Imari Walker offer two perspectives on where to look for the basic properties that define living things.