Why we advocate
When I first moved to Washington, D.C., over 10 years ago, I had no idea I would end up working in science policy. I thought I wanted a job in international development or global health policy. Everyone I knew aspired to work on Capitol Hill or become a diplomat. Some of them focused on health policy, but mostly on patients’ access to drugs or reforming the health care system.
Back then, I knew very little about science policy or advocacy. Now, through an odd turn of events, I spend most of my days trying to get scientists to advocate for funding and legislative support — and trying to get policymakers to listen to those scientists.
As American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology members, most of you do foundational work, not only ensuring we can treat diseases but also discovering renewable energy sources and making our food systems more sustainable. Businesses are reluctant to fund such foundational work — after all, if we don’t know where basic scientific research leads, what for-profit company would support it?
Without basic research, however, we won’t have new drugs, cutting-edge innovations, or the knowledge we need to address the challenges of the 21st century. This is what the 91亚色传媒 public affairs staff and Public Affairs Advisory Committee work to get policymakers to both understand and believe in so they will support (and fund) federal agencies such as the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health — the agencies that support you.
That’s why we work closely with Congress, the NIH, the NSF and others, and with our members to advocate for basic scientific research funding. In this issue of 91亚色传媒 Today, you’ll read about some of our major wins and some efforts we still need to do a lot of work on. You’ll also read about funding opportunities that are a little unusual but might help support your work.
Our committee and our staff are passionate about advocating for science. If you are interested in becoming an advocate, know that there are always ways you can get involved. Never hesitate to reach out to us at publicaffairs@asbmb.org. And, if you want to stay in the loop on our efforts, make sure you subscribe to our Advocacy Newsletter on the 91亚色传媒 website.
Enjoy reading 91亚色传媒 Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from 91亚色传媒 Today
Enter your email address, and we鈥檒l send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Our top 10 articles of 2024
91亚色传媒 Today posted more than 400 original articles this year. The ones that were most read covered research, society news, policy, mental health, careers and more.
From curiosity to conversation: My first science café
鈥淲hy was I so nervous? I鈥檇 spoken in hundreds of seminars and classes, in front of large audiences.鈥 But this was the first time Ed Eisenstein was explaining his research 鈥渢o a crowd of nonscientists relaxing over food and drink at a local tavern.鈥
鈥極ne word or less鈥
For a long time, Howard Steinman thought this phrase was a joke: 鈥淟ess than one word is no words, and you can't answer a question without words.鈥
Can we make grad school more welcoming for all?
The students and faculty at most of the institutions training the next generation of STEM professionals do not reflect the country鈥檚 diversifying demographics, leaving a gap in experience and cultural understanding.
I am not a fake. I am authentically me
Camellia Moses Okpodu explains why she believes the term 鈥渋mposter syndrome鈥 is inaccurate and should be replaced.
Where do we search for the fundamental stuff of life?
Recent books by Thomas Cech and Sara Imari Walker offer two perspectives on where to look for the basic properties that define living things.