91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½

Blotter

Share your thoughts

on remote study sections

Are you serving on a grant-review panel from afar? We want to know how your experience is going
Benjamin Corb
March 25, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced federal agencies that fund scientific research to move their grant-application review panels online. The National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have used remote study sections in the past, and the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ public affairs office heard mixed reviews about those endeavors. Now that the need for social distancing has resulted in widespread adoption of remote grant-application review, we feel it’s important to record reviewers’ experiences contemporaneously and then, at a later date, share those comments with funding agencies so that the remote-review process can be optimized.

We invite you to use this simple form to share your thoughts on your remote study section experience. 

Here are some of the questions we have, but don’t feel bound to them. We welcome any and all comments about your experiences.

  • Do you think the quality of review will change as a result of remote interactions?  How so?
  • Do you think remote participants are more or less likely to contribute to discussions?  Why?
  • What is lost by not having face-to-face interactions? 
  • What is gained?

We intend to share your comments with both the scientific community and federal agencies. We also hope to develop recommendations for improving remote grant review.

We hope you will take a few minutes to share your thoughts, and we strongly encourage you to share this platform with your colleagues of all disciplines.

Together, we can help the community in a time of need.

Enjoy reading 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Benjamin Corb

Benjamin Corb is the former director of public affairs at 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½.

Related articles

Chicago’s scientific interface
Gabriella Rant & Madeline Ganshert
Meet Robert Helsley
Christopher Radka
Upcoming opportunities
91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today Staff
From the Journals: MCP
Indumathi Sridharan

Get the latest from 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

Black excellence in biotech: Shaping the future of an industry
Observance

Black excellence in biotech: Shaping the future of an industry

Feb. 28, 2025

This Black History Month, we highlight the impact of DEI initiatives, trailblazing scientists and industry leaders working to create a more inclusive and scientific community. Discover how you can be part of the movement.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ releases statement on sustaining U.S. scientific leadership
Blotter

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ releases statement on sustaining U.S. scientific leadership

Jan. 16, 2025

The society encourages the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government to continue their support of the nation’s leadership in science.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ and advocacy: What we accomplished in 2024
What we do

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ and advocacy: What we accomplished in 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

PAAC members met with policymakers to advocate for basic scientific research, connected some fellow members with funding opportunities and trained others to advocate for science.

‘Our work is about science transforming people’s lives’
Interview

‘Our work is about science transforming people’s lives’

Dec. 17, 2024

Ann West, chair of the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Public Affairs Advisory Committee, sits down Monica Bertagnolli, director of the National Institutes of Health.

Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Essay

Applied research won’t flourish without basic science

Oct. 6, 2024

Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ weighs in on NIH reform proposal
Blotter

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ weighs in on NIH reform proposal

Sept. 25, 2024

The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.