91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½

Funding

Two funding proposals

Michael R. Stallcup
By Michael R. Stallcup
Nov. 1, 2018

One of the main problems facing all biomedical researchers these days (new and old ones alike) is that there are simply too many scientists applying for too few dollars. Changing the number of scientists who apply for funding is difficult to address, and a huge increase in the budgets of federal funding agencies does not look likely in the near term. But there are some things that could be done to make more funding available to researchers within the current budgets of federal funding agencies.

Currently, federal agencies will allow principal investigators to pay for up to 95 percent of their salaries from grants. If the percentage of salary that could be obtained from federal grants and contracts were to be limited to, say, 50 percent, this would make more funds available for the actual research and would, in effect, make universities and other research institutions take more responsibility for the salaries of their employees. A gradual implementation of such a policy over several years would allow the research institutions to make adjustments and avoid the adverse impact of a fast transition.

Another problem more specific to researchers in biochemistry and molecular biology is the difficulty in getting funding for basic research that has no obvious translational potential in the near term. I think this problem can be solved only by creation of new National Institutes of Health study sections with a mandate to review basic research. Currently, much of the basic research is crowded into a few study sections or sent to study sections that place a premium on translation.

Enjoy reading 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Michael R. Stallcup
Michael R. Stallcup

Michael R. Stallcup is a professor of biochemistry and molecular medicine at the University of Southern California.
 

Get the latest from 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

Black excellence in biotech: Shaping the future of an industry
Observance

Black excellence in biotech: Shaping the future of an industry

Feb. 28, 2025

This Black History Month, we highlight the impact of DEI initiatives, trailblazing scientists and industry leaders working to create a more inclusive and scientific community. Discover how you can be part of the movement.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ releases statement on sustaining U.S. scientific leadership
Blotter

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ releases statement on sustaining U.S. scientific leadership

Jan. 16, 2025

The society encourages the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government to continue their support of the nation’s leadership in science.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ and advocacy: What we accomplished in 2024
What we do

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ and advocacy: What we accomplished in 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

PAAC members met with policymakers to advocate for basic scientific research, connected some fellow members with funding opportunities and trained others to advocate for science.

‘Our work is about science transforming people’s lives’
Interview

‘Our work is about science transforming people’s lives’

Dec. 17, 2024

Ann West, chair of the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Public Affairs Advisory Committee, sits down Monica Bertagnolli, director of the National Institutes of Health.

Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Essay

Applied research won’t flourish without basic science

Oct. 6, 2024

Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ weighs in on NIH reform proposal
Blotter

91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ weighs in on NIH reform proposal

Sept. 25, 2024

The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.