Lessons from how the polio vaccine went from the lab to the public that Americans can learn from today
In 1955, after a field trial involving 1.8 million Americans, the world’s first successful polio vaccine was declared “.”
It was arguably the most significant biomedical advance of the past century. Despite the , manufacturers, government leaders and the nonprofit that funded the vaccine’s development made .
Having about the polio vaccine’s field trials, we believe the lessons learned during that chapter in medical history are worth considering as the race to develop COVID-19 vaccines proceeds.
Sabin and Salk
Today, many competing efforts are underway to create a coronavirus vaccine, each employing different methods to generate the production of universally needed antibodies. Likewise, in the 1950s there were different approaches to making a polio vaccine.
The prevailing medical orthodoxy, led by , held that only a live-virus vaccine, which involved using a weakened form of the polio virus to stimulate antibodies, could work. That theory stemmed from work by the physician , who in the 1700s determined that milkmaids exposed to the cowpox virus-laden pus of cowpox-infected cattle did not catch smallpox. Smallpox was the deadly pandemic of the era, and this discovery led to a vaccine that brought about .

, a doctor and scientist based at the University of Pittsburgh, on the other hand, believed a killed virus, which would completely lose its infectious qualities, could still trick the body into creating protective antibodies against the polio virus.
A nonprofit organization, the , funded and thus directed the polio vaccine quest. Established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s former law partner, Basil O’ Connor, it raised money for polio research and treatment. As part of this fundraising effort, Americans were called upon to send dimes to the White House in what became known as the March of Dimes.
O'Connor gambled on Salk rather than Sabin.
Clinical trials
By 1953, Salk and his team had shown their experimental vaccine worked – first on monkeys in their lab, then on children who already had polio at the D.T. Watson Home for Crippled Children, and then on a small group of healthy children in Pittsburgh. One of the soon followed.
It began on . Some 650,000 children got the Salk polio vaccine or a placebo, and 1.2 million other kids received no injection but were monitored as an .
Salk’s mentor, virologist Thomas Francis, independently monitored the study. After months of meticulously analyzing data, Francis revealed – exactly 10 years after FDR’s death and nearly a year after the trial began.
A manufacturing error
When asked who owned the patent to his vaccine, Jonas Salk famously replied that it belonged to the people and that patenting it would be like “.”
President Dwight D. Eisenhower expressed his belief that every child should receive the polio vaccine, without indicating how that would happen. Eisenhower charged Health, Education and Welfare Secretary to work out the details in coordination with Surgeon General .
Congressional Democrats advocated for a plan that would make the polio vaccine free to everyone, which Hobby rejected as a “.”
Hobby also insisted that private companies should take care of producing Salk’s vaccine, . However, she acknowledged that the government lacked a plan to meet .
A black market arose. jacked up the cost of a dose of the vaccine, which was supposed to be US$2, to $20. As a result, the well-to-do got special access to a vaccine the public had funded.
The hands-off approach changed once reports surfaced that children who had received Salk’s vaccine were in the hospital, with polio symptoms. At first, Scheele, the surgeon general, reacted with skepticism. He suggested that those kids might have been infected before vaccination.
But once six , inoculations halted until more information about their safety could be gathered. In all, 10 kids who were vaccinated early on died after becoming infected with polio, and some 200 experienced some degree of paralysis.
soon determined that the cases in which children became sick or died could be traced back to one of the six companies: Cutter Labs. It had not followed Salk’s detailed protocol to manufacture the vaccine, failing to kill the virus. As a result, children were incorrectly injected with the live virus.
Inoculation resumed in mid-June with tighter government controls and a . In July, Hobby stepped down, citing personal reasons.

Eisenhower then signed the , which slated – enough to fund wider public distribution. Within a year, 30 million American kids had been inoculated, and the had fallen almost by half.
Heeding a lesson learned
By 1962, there were fewer than 1,000 cases of polio in the U.S. And by .
Years after the vaccine’s development, Jonas Salk would recount that sometimes he would meet people who would not even know what polio was – which he found tremendously gratifying. But the events of this past year, with all the , have proved that the history of polio’s defeat is worth remembering.
recently joined forces to jointly promise that they would not rush anything to market until and unless the clearly delineated standards for safety and efficacy are met.
But should a modern-day Cutter incident happen again with a coronavirus vaccine, the public’s could easily crumble further, impeding the effort to get as many people quickly immunized against COVID-19 as possible.
Bringing this pandemic to an end will require more than the government’s approval of one or more coronavirus vaccines that work. Coordinating a widespread vaccination campaign will also demand the navigation of logistics, economics and politics amid an equitable approach to the distribution of these new vaccines and the public’s .
This final push will, in addition, require the often uneasy partnership among the government, the private sector and – as is true today with massive contributions from the and other charitable sources – philanthropy.
, Senior Lecturer, and , Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Pharmacy,
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .
Enjoy reading 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½ Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Science
Science highlights or most popular articles

Meet Robert Helsley
The Journal of Lipid Research junior associate editor studies chronic liver disease and was the first in his family to attend college.

From the Journals: MCP
Protein acetylation helps plants adapt to light. Mapping protein locations in 3D tissues. Demystifying the glycan–protein interactome. Read about these recent papers.

Exploring life’s blueprint: Gene expression in development and evolution
Meet Julia Zeitlinger and David Arnosti — two co-chairs of the 91ÑÇÉ«´«Ã½â€™s 2025 meeting on gene expression, to be held June 26-29, in Kansas City, Missouri.

From the journals: JLR
Protein analysis of dopaminergic neurons. Predicting immunotherapy responses in lung cancer. ZASP: An efficient proteomics sample prep method. Read about papers on these topics recently published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

New mass spectrometry assay speeds up UTI diagnosis
Scientists in Quebec use liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to reduce the time needed to test for bacteria in urine from days to minutes — and with smaller samples.

From the journals: MCP
Protein analysis of dopaminergic neurons. Predicting immunotherapy responses in lung cancer. ZASP: An efficient proteomics sample prep method. Read about papers on these topics recently published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.