An unpredictable journey
People often ask me how I got into science and biochemistry. I do not come from a family of scientists. Instead, my earliest recollection of exposure to science is as a teenager wandering around the displays and halls of the Natural History Museum and the Science Museum in London. For reasons that are hard to recollect, I was fascinated by all things of the natural world, and I spent hour upon hour every weekend in these two great museums diligently devouring all the knowledge I could find.
It therefore felt quite natural to study biology and biochemistry for my undergraduate degree at King’s College London and then pursue a Ph.D. in biochemistry at the National Institute for Medical Research, also in London. As luck would have it, I landed a postdoc in Lewis Cantley’s lab in Boston, first at Tufts University and thereafter at Harvard Medical School. That’s where my interests in cell and molecular biology and biochemistry solidified and, equally importantly, where I first encountered the Journal of Biological Chemistry and the 91亚色传媒.
In the mid-1990s, the JBC was still a print publication. Each week, Dr. Cantley would receive the large, distinctively light green JBC hard copy. He’d circle and label with the initials of each postdoc and student a manuscript in the table of contents that was relevant for us. That was our signal to read that paper. He performed this weekly routine much in the same way we now look at eTOCs in our emails.
Academic publishing has undergone a radical (re)evolution and change in the ensuing 30 years, but one thing has not changed: Since its inception in 1905, JBC has set the standard for high-quality, enduring research. It’s a journal for scientists, run by scientists, and owned and supported by the 91亚色传媒, a society that formed shortly after JBC was founded and that, after more than 100 years, continues to support and advocate for science.
As a postdoc in the 1990s, I never could have predicted my own journey with the 91亚色传媒. I was extremely proud to publish my papers in JBC as a trainee and then in my own lab, and as I transitioned to independence, I jumped at the chance to review JBC papers on an ad hoc basis whenever asked. Perhaps this was one reason I was formally invited to join the JBC editorial board, on which I served two terms.
As an EBM, I would review 60, 70, sometimes 80 papers in one year (something we no longer allow at JBC). At an 91亚色传媒 annual meeting, the inimitable Bob Simoni, a JBC associate editor, told me that one of the associate editors had coined the term “tokered” to describe the quantity and speed of JBC reviewing. Perhaps this is why I was invited to join the JBC board as an associate editor, and again I jumped at this opportunity.
After serving one and a half terms as an AE, I was delighted to be chosen as editor-in-chief, starting in fall 2021.
People often ask me, Why do you do all this work? I am a firm believer in academic science and society publishing and giving back to the scientific community. I am also a believer in many of the principles that guide the 91亚色传媒 and JBC in terms of publishing, advocating for science, promoting a culture of inclusivity and diversity, and ensuring the integrity of the published content in the three 91亚色传媒 journals.
Being an EBM, AE and EiC is a tremendous amount of work. We all are working scientists, with many demands on our time and countless commitments. But this work is incredibly rewarding. As active scientists in each of our communities, we play a major role in shaping the direction of the journal and ensure we maintain the standards of rigor, reproducibility and enduring science that 91亚色传媒 journals are known for.
I also have been privileged to meet and work with some extraordinary scientists over the years, most notably Herbert Tabor, who was JBC EiC for more than 40 years, and Lila Gierasch, my JBC EiC predecessor. The spirit of community and fraternity at the 91亚色传媒 and JBC is something I pay a great deal of attention to when it comes to recruiting new EBMs and AEs. This spirit is equally evident in the many staff members who have worked at the 91亚色传媒 over the years.
When I received news that I had been selected as a fellow of the 91亚色传媒 last year, I was incredibly honored but also tremendously humbled. Seeing my name alongside so many extraordinary scientists, many of whom I consider my science heroes, is something that teenager wandering around the museums in London some 40 years ago would never in his wildest imagination have predicted.
Other Fellow articles
Paul Craig: People in the 91亚色传媒 have changed my life
Susanna Greer: Saying yes to a community of communicators
Nathan Vanderford: Investing in the next generation
Ralph A. Bradshaw: The 91亚色传媒 and me
Enjoy reading 91亚色传媒 Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from 91亚色传媒 Today
Enter your email address, and we鈥檒l send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Our top 10 articles of 2024
91亚色传媒 Today posted more than 400 original articles this year. The ones that were most read covered research, society news, policy, mental health, careers and more.
From curiosity to conversation: My first science café
鈥淲hy was I so nervous? I鈥檇 spoken in hundreds of seminars and classes, in front of large audiences.鈥 But this was the first time Ed Eisenstein was explaining his research 鈥渢o a crowd of nonscientists relaxing over food and drink at a local tavern.鈥
鈥極ne word or less鈥
For a long time, Howard Steinman thought this phrase was a joke: 鈥淟ess than one word is no words, and you can't answer a question without words.鈥
Can we make grad school more welcoming for all?
The students and faculty at most of the institutions training the next generation of STEM professionals do not reflect the country鈥檚 diversifying demographics, leaving a gap in experience and cultural understanding.
I am not a fake. I am authentically me
Camellia Moses Okpodu explains why she believes the term 鈥渋mposter syndrome鈥 is inaccurate and should be replaced.
Where do we search for the fundamental stuff of life?
Recent books by Thomas Cech and Sara Imari Walker offer two perspectives on where to look for the basic properties that define living things.